shouldLockBeGranted == X < Y == FALSE. JBoss Cache contains a homegrown DI framework. Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions Go to original post Actions Related Issues Retrieving data ... Hide Permalink Jit Ken Tan added a comment - 06/Nov/15 19:17 Abhishek, try disabling tungsten? http://odenews.net/unable-to/ora-04031-unable-to-allocate-bytes-of-shared-memory.html
I recommend not bothering with development/production separation when you're still learning. sqlContext.setConf("spark.sql.tungsten.enabled", "false") Show Jit Ken Tan added a comment - 06/Nov/15 19:17 Abhishek, try disabling tungsten? These session nodes are both read and written to but I've also seen this error on read-only nodes. It works for me with 4 JBoss cluster nodes, 40 cache writes per second per cluster node, performed randomly on a pool of 500 cache nodes. https://network.informatica.com/thread/16232
Re: Unable to acquire deployment lock. To give you the knowledge you need the instant it becomes available, these articles may be presented in a raw and unedited form. Lock held by [null]"comes when doing stress test on the cache (100 requests in 10 sec repeted 10 times with JMeter)The error comes more likely after a while, the first requests I also tried with bookshelf but got the same error.
You can show the physical plan by `df.explain()` Hide Permalink Sebastian YEPES FERNANDEZ added a comment - 25/Sep/15 07:30 Is there currently any workaround this issue? More Like This Retrieving data ... NODE-A# ping 184.108.40.206 -c 2 PING 220.127.116.11 (18.104.22.168) 56(84) bytes of data. 10[IKE] initiating IKE_SA r1~v1 to 22.214.171.124 11[IKE] sending cert request for "C=de, ST=Bayern, L=Munich, O=Nokia Siemens Networks, OU=RTP, CN=www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com, Spark Configuration View Responses Resources Overview Security Blog Security Measurement Severity Ratings Backporting Policies Product Signing (GPG) Keys Discussions Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Hat Satellite Customer Portal Private Groups
How are brakes cooled on heavy aircraft? I also installed node-v4.2.1-x64.msi (restarted the system) and Git-2.6.2-64-bit, but still not able to install and getting the above error. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2014-December/006991.html Is it legal to mortgage a property twice or more?
I have tried increase shuffle.memoryFraction to 0.8 but that didn't help. https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9220 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9604 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9613 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-9639 Root Cause Another thread is already holding the write lock on the listed node, preventing the current thread from completing its transaction. Is the expectation that Tungsten sort will be disabled in an upcoming checkin ? Could you provide more information about you job?
The caveat here is that the LockManager will be fixed, regardless of changes to the
Show 2 replies 1. http://odenews.net/unable-to/unable-to-allocate-enough-memory-status.html Step: 1 ) Start traffic from NODE-A. I am also facing it with the last 1.5.1: Error Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to acquire 33554432 bytes of memory at org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.acquireNewPage(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:351) at org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.
Interconnection networks offer an attractive and economical solution to this communication crisis and are fast becoming pervasive in digital systems. share|improve this answer answered Oct 29 '15 at 14:41 Ingo Muschenetz 3,23411219 add a comment| up vote 2 down vote This is a cut and paste from an earlier entry and Each node must be able to calculate the superiority of one lock request over another without communicating with the other nodes. my review here Granted, but waiting lockAcquisitionTimeout millis until lock is available.A: received request for lock on "foo" for TX Y.
We migrated from 1.1 to 1.5 and our jobs heavily depends on join. Maybe there are multiple join/aggregation/sort in your query? I have tried increase shuffle.memoryFraction to 0.8 but that didn't help.
esp=3des-md5! Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 1 in stage 25.0 failed 4 times, most recent failure: Lost task 1.3 in stage 25.0 (TID 3962, 126.96.36.199): java.io.IOException: Unable to acquire 16777216 Go to my computer and in the search button write installer_nodejs_windows.msi. http://odenews.net/unable-to/unable-to-allocate-memory-for-tdi.html Re: Unable to acquire deployment lock.
Failed to correctly acquire installer_nodejs_windows.msi –mega6382 Sep 18 at 22:21 add a comment| 4 Answers 4 active oldest votes up vote 37 down vote I wasn't able to locate installer_nodejs_windows.msi on shouldLockBeGranted == X < null == true. We are absolutely doing lots of joins/aggregation/sorts. Dally,Brian TowlesLimited preview - 2004Principles and Practices of Interconnection NetworksWilliam J.
Why not upgrade to 1.6? It's better than everybody waiting 15 seconds for a TimeoutException.The inherent unfairness of the artificial ordering of transactions is mitigated by the fact that we use node.replace(key, oldValue, newValue) to guarantee Where is it established that Hikaru Sulu was born in San Francisco? We do many of these in parallel.
Please click it and install the node that has been already provided to you rather than installing it by yourself. Show Davies Liu added a comment - 09/Sep/15 00:46 This also could be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10341?filter=-2 , could you test with 1.5-RC3? The primary key of a GlobalTransaction is a JGroups Address and a java.lang.Long transaction ID. share|improve this answer answered Nov 5 '15 at 11:11 Joan van Zyl 211 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote Right click the Aptana Studio setup file and click "Run
Canonical links: Homepage Docs Blog Wiki Github Repo Mailing List NodeUp (Podcast) NodeSchool created by bittereda community for 6 yearsmessage the moderatorsMODERATORSbittereds5fskahweeabout moderation team »discussions in /r/node<>X27 points · 1 comment Announcing TypeScript 2.15 points · 1 comment State Resolution Structure the cache to minimize concurrent access to the same node, particularly from threads on different cluster members. Why this fix is not merged into Spark 1.5.x release? You can not post a blank message.
This is still an issue with the latest Spark 1.5.2 branch. If someone can at least point where in the code might be the issue? We Acted. Hide Permalink Yong Zhang added a comment - 20/Mar/16 14:43 On Spark 1.5.2, We also face this issue when "braodcast" join being used in the DateFrame.
It gets installed. Not granted.A: prepare() failed on C. The TX ordering is artificial and not fair, just deterministic).A: commit();B: received request for lock on "foo" for TX X.